Wednesday, July 02, 2008
The ALT.NET virtuous network
This is an attempt at visualising the virtuous relationship between various ALT.NET development practices. Any comments?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Twitter
Life as a mort.
Code Rant
Hire Me!
Notepad, thoughts out loud, learning in public, misunderstandings, mistakes. undiluted opinions. I'm Mike Hadlow, an itinerant developer. I live near Brighton on the south coast of England.
All code is published under an MIT licence. You are free to take it and use it for any purpose without attribution. There is no warranty whatsoever.
Posts
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(103)
-
▼
July
(10)
- Playing with ADO.NET Data Services
- Today's WTF
- There's usually an easier way
- More fun with 'yield return'
- MSTest is sapping my will to live
- Extension Method + LINQ + Interface = Reusable Que...
- ALT.NET UK (un)conference
- Why isn't Microsoft ALT.NET?
- The ALT.NET virtuous network
- Eagerly Loading Northwind: playing with DataLoadOp...
-
▼
July
(10)
7 comments:
nice, but what's so great about WCF? my one brush with it so far was a traumatic episode of bloody-minded YAGNI violation...
Jon, very good!
The main reason for including WCF is because of the nice integration between it and the Windsor IoC. Being able to write IoC components and then just expose them as services with a bit of config is a very nice story.
sounds really interesting - i use windsor a lot. can you point me to any examples (or elaborate a tiny bit)?
It's another product of Ayende's planet sized brain (but I don't think anyone's ever asked him to look after a carpark):
http://www.ayende.com/Blog/archive/2007/06/12/WCF-Windsor-Integration.aspx
I've got a vague plan to do a detailed post on the subject soonish, so watch this space :)
cool, thanks. ayende gives great open source but i find the signal/noise ratio on his blog a bit rubbish - i sometimes miss the gems!
yo Mike - great post.
imo this is all stuff that Mainstream.NET people should do anyway ...
I mean - High cohesion/Low coupling? that's software engineering 101
Grammar: "Less bugs" should be "Fewer bugs"
Post a Comment